|
TOPIC: Implementation of EN61000-3-2 and amendment A14
ISSUE: 2
REVISION DATE: 12/10/00
PREVIOUS REVISION DATE: 10/10/00
BACKGROUND: The IEC standard EN61000-3-2 was published
in the OJ in 1995 and its implementation is mandatory from 1st Jan
2001. CENELEC have published an amendment A14 that diverges from the IEC standard
with a date of adoption of Jan 2001. It is expected that most customers will
wish to take advantage of the CENELEC standard. The 2 main issues are that the
test labs will have to update their test equipment to use A14 and also some
customers that must meet Class D under the IEC standard will be able to meet
a lower Class A limit with A14.
PROBLEM: How does a test lab proceed after 1st
Jan 2001? There are 2 issues:
- When to update the test equipment?
- What to advise customers?
GUIDELINES:
- Test laboratories are strongly encouraged to upgrade their
test equipment as soon as possible. Once upgraded compliance testing to A14
may be assumed to indicate compliance to both A14 and IEC 61000-3-2 (1995)
+ amendments A1 & A2 given the large measurement uncertainty associated
with these standards. Customers may use testing to A14 to declare their products
to either standard.
- If a product is not defined as Class D in amendment A14 then it should be tested to Class
A.
Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by the EMC Test
Laboratories Association or any of its officers or members for the contents,
specifications and/or advice referred to or contained in this Technical
Memorandum and/or action taken as a result of information contained in this
Technical Memorandum. Note that:
1. The Association is not by supplying this Technical Memorandum providing
professional advice or guidance to any specific party on any specific matter
and no legal relationship is created by the provision of this Technical
Memorandum.
2. Parties should take specific advice when dealing with specific situations
and consult their own professional advisors in this regard.
3. Members are free to deviate from the above guidelines where they think
it appropriate, unworkable, or not commercially viable. Under these circumstances,
the EMCTLA Secretariat should be informed of the reasons for the deviation
so that the matter can be reviewed. |
© EMCTLA
|