Technical Guidance Note 27


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOPIC: Battery charger sold as computer accessory.

ISSUE: 2

REVISION DATE: 27.1.98

PREVIOUS REVISION DATE: 6.9.95

BACKGROUND: A Manufacturer makes a battery charger for sale with their computers. The sole and only purpose is to charge the special NiCad batteries used in their machines. It is sold either as an accessory to the computer or bundled as part of a total package.

PROBLEM: Is it ITE equipment (i.e. within EN55022) or non-ITE (i.e. within EN50081-1)? Alternatively, is this a decision the manufacturer can take and wait for someone to prove them wrong?

GUIDELINES: Where the battery charger is sold as part of a computer system, then the compliance of the battery charger would be encompassed by the compliance of the whole system.

When sold as an accessory, then its compliance must be proven in its own right. Section 2.1 or EN55022: 1987 defines Information Technology Equipment (ITE) as follows:

"Equipment designed for the purpose of:

a) receiving data from an external source

b) performing some processing functions on the received data

c) providing a data output"

A battery charger does not really meet this definition therefore EN55022: 1987 is not really an applicable standard. As a result, EN50081-1 should be applied.

Disclaimer
No responsibility or liability can be accepted by the EMC Test Laboratories Association or any of its officers or members for the contents, specifications and/or advice referred to or contained in this Technical Memorandum and/or action taken as a result of information contained in this Technical Memorandum. Note that:
1. The Association is not by supplying this Technical Memorandum providing professional advice or guidance to any specific party on any specific matter and no legal relationship is created by the provision of this Technical Memorandum.
2. Parties should take specific advice when dealing with specific situations and consult their own professional advisors in this regard.
3. Members are free to deviate from the above guidelines where they think it appropriate, unworkable, or not commercially viable. Under these circumstances, the EMCTLA Secretariat should be informed of the reasons for the deviation so that the matter can be reviewed.

 

© 1998 EMCTLA


                        EMCTLA Home | About Us | Members | Meeting Calendar | Documents | Technical Guidance | Technical Guidance